Efficacy and Safety of LDL-Lowering Therapy Among Men and Women: Meta-Analysis of 174,000 Participants
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration, Jordan Fulcher, Jonathan Emberson · Meta-analysis of randomized trials
BlueRipple Assessment
For years there was lingering doubt about whether statins work as well in women as in men — a doubt that, left unaddressed, led to undertreatment of women. This large meta-analysis was designed to settle it.
Pooling individual data from over 174,000 participants across 27 randomized trials, the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists found that statin therapy produced essentially the same proportional reduction in major vascular events for women as for men — about 16 and 22 percent per unit of LDL lowering respectively, with no statistically significant difference by sex. All-cause mortality fell in both. At equivalent baseline risk, the benefit is equivalent.
The practical message corrects a real disparity: there is no good reason to treat women’s cholesterol less aggressively than men’s. The same LDL-lowering logic, and the same expected benefit, applies.
We rate the evidence very strong. An individual-patient meta-analysis of this scale is among the most reliable forms of evidence, and it provides a definitive answer to a clinically important question about who benefits from statins.
The original source
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration; Fulcher J, O'Connell R, Voysey M, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Mihaylova B, et al. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015 Apr 11;385(9976):1397-1405.
BlueRipple Health provides consumer education and research synthesis for informed health advocacy. This is not medical advice. Discuss all health decisions with a qualified clinician.